Resources that demonstrate the benefits of co-creation in learning and teaching, plus additional useful resources. Evidence of benefits Co-creation leads to: More culturally responsive and inclusive practices Cook-Sather, A. (2020). Respecting voices: How the co-creation of teaching and learning can support academic staff, underrepresented students, and equitable practices. Higher Education, 79(5), 885–901 Cook-Sather, A. (2022). Co-creating equitable teaching and learning: Structuring student voice into higher education. Harvard Education Press. Cook‐Sather, A., & Agu, P. (2013). 16: Student consultants of color and faculty members working together toward culturally sustaining pedagogy. To improve the academy, 32(1), 271-285. Nasri, N., Mohamad Nasri, N., & Abd Talib, M. A. (2023). Developing an inclusive curriculum: Understanding co-creation through cultural lens. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 27(9), 1072 1083. Tai, J. H. M., Dollinger, M., Ajjawi, R., de St, J., Jorre, T., Krattli, S., McCarthy, D., & Prezioso, D. (2023). Designing assessment for inclusion: An exploration of diverse students’ assessment experiences. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(3), 403–417. Enhanced engagement, meta-cognitive awareness and sense of identity, improved teaching and classroom experiences Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. John Wiley & Sons. Enhanced belonging, relationships, confidence, trust Bovill, C. (2020) Co-creating learning and teaching: towards relational pedagogy in higher education, Abingdon: Routledge. Chilvers, L., Fox, A., & Bennett, S. (2021). A student-staff partnership approach to course enhancement: Principles for enabling dialogue through repurposing subject-specific materials and metaphors. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(1), 14–24. Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S. L., Matthews, K. E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., Knorr, K., Marquis, E., Shammas, R., & Swaim, K. (2017). A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1), 15–37. Increased engagement and motivation, leading to improved academic performance Bovill, C. (2014). An investigation of co-created curricula within higher education in the UK, Ireland and the USA. Innovations in education and teaching international, 51(1), 15–25.Cates, R. M., Madigan, M. R., & Reitenauer, V. L. (2018). ’Locations of Possibility’: Critical perspectives on partnership. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(1), 33–46. Deeley, S. J., & Bovill, C. (2017). Staff student partnership in assessment: enhancing assessment literacy through democratic practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(3), 463–477.Lubicz-Nawrocka, T., & Bovill, C. (2021). Do students experience transformation through co-creating curriculum in higher education? Teaching in Higher Education, 28(7), 1744–1760.Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S. L., Matthews, K. E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., Knorr, K., Marquis, E., Shammas, R., & Swaim, K. (2017). A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1), 15–37.Shift in focus from grades to learning Delpish, A., Holmes, A, Knight-McKenna, M., Mihans, R., Darby, A., King, K., & Felten, P. (2010). Equalizing voices: Student-faculty partnership in course design. In C. Werder & M. M. Otis. (Eds.), Engaging student voices in the study of teaching and learning (pp. 96–114). Sterling, VA: Stylus. Increased sense of feeling valued Deeley, S. J., & Bovill, C. (2017). Staff student partnership in assessment: enhancing assessment literacy through democratic practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(3), 463–477.Practice at working democratically Bergmark, U., & Westman, S. (2016). Co-creating curriculum in higher education: Promoting democratic values and a multidimensional view on learning. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(1), 28–40.Increased relevance Bron, J., & Veugelers, W. (2014). Why we need to involve our students in curriculum design: five arguments for student voice. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 16, 125-139. Additional co-creation resources Bovill, C. (2020). Co-creation in learning and teaching: The case for a whole-class approach in higher education. Higher education, 79(6), 1023–1037. Castro-Sanchez (2025) A two stage exam meets co-creation Kenny (2019) Student-staff co-creation of a course: Understanding gender in the contemporary world Lubicz-Nawrocka, T. 2020. 'Exploration of how curriculum co-creation advances student and staff aims for Scottish higher education’, PhD Thesis, University of Edinburgh, EdinburghRowah-Dewar et al (2024) Reflections on Student and Staff Co-Creation: Are we there yet? Michalopoulou & Tizeba (2026) Re-centring voices: student involvement in course design This article was published on Wednesday 10 June 2026